Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 21837, 2022 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2186031

ABSTRACT

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) has been developed as a powerful statistical procedure in psychological research. EFA's purpose is to identify the nature and number of latent constructs (= factors) underlying a set of observed variables. Since the research goal of EFA is to determine what causes the observed responses, EFA is ideal for hypothesis-based studies, such as identifying the number and nature of latent factors (e.g., cause, risk factors, etc.). However, the application of EFA in the biomedical field has been limited. Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is peripheral neuropathy, in which the presence of antibodies to glycolipids has been associated with clinical signs. Although the precise mechanism for the generation of anti-glycolipid antibodies is unclear, we hypothesized that latent factors, such as distinct autoantigens and microbes, could induce different sets of anti-glycolipid antibodies in subsets of GBS patients. Using 55 glycolipid antibody titers from 100 GBS and 30 control sera obtained by glycoarray, we conducted EFA and extracted four factors related to neuroantigens and one potentially suppressive factor, each of which was composed of the distinct set of anti-glycolipid antibodies. The four groups of anti-glycolipid antibodies categorized by unsupervised EFA were consistent with experimental and clinical findings reported previously. Therefore, we proved that unsupervised EFA could be applied to biomedical data to extract latent factors. Applying EFA for other biomedical big data may elucidate latent factors of other diseases with unknown causes or suppressing/exacerbating factors, including COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Guillain-Barre Syndrome , Humans , Autoantibodies , Glycolipids , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Gangliosides
2.
Cancer Sci ; 113(10): 3313-3320, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2052328

ABSTRACT

Cervical cancer is caused by infections of the human papillomavirus (HPV), which can be prevented by vaccinations. In Japan, although about 3000 people die of cervical cancer annually, the HPV vaccination rate has remained extremely low in the eligible population since many Japanese have been concerned that "diverse symptoms," such as chronic pain, movement disorders, and cognitive impairment, may occur as adverse reactions after HPV vaccination. The concern has been raised by media coverage of the ongoing HPV vaccine lawsuits, in which the plaintiffs complained of their symptoms caused by HPV vaccination. The claims have been based on the alleged pathogenic findings in research articles on HPV vaccines, summarized in the document prepared by the plaintiffs' attorneys. We critically evaluated these articles, in which the authors proposed the following findings/hypothesis: (i) molecular mimicry between HPV L1 and human proteins leads to the production of cross-reactive antibodies; and (ii) HPV vaccine injection in mice causes damage in the brain, a mouse model for HPV vaccine associated neuro-immunopathic syndrome (HANS). We found that these hypotheses were based mainly on the findings from a few research groups and that all the articles had flaws in the method, result, or discussion sections. Our current evaluation should help better understand the validity of the findings, which have been often misunderstood as the truth by the general public. We propose to accumulate high-quality data on potential adverse events following HPV vaccination and to continue critically evaluating them.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Animals , Female , Humans , Mice , Molecular Mimicry , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects
3.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 11361, 2022 07 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1937440

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led people to wear face masks daily in public. Although the effectiveness of face masks against viral transmission has been extensively studied, there have been few reports on potential hygiene issues due to bacteria and fungi attached to the face masks. We aimed to (1) quantify and identify the bacteria and fungi attaching to the masks, and (2) investigate whether the mask-attached microbes could be associated with the types and usage of the masks and individual lifestyles. We surveyed 109 volunteers on their mask usage and lifestyles, and cultured bacteria and fungi from either the face-side or outer-side of their masks. The bacterial colony numbers were greater on the face-side than the outer-side; the fungal colony numbers were fewer on the face-side than the outer-side. A longer mask usage significantly increased the fungal colony numbers but not the bacterial colony numbers. Although most identified microbes were non-pathogenic in humans; Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Cladosporium, we found several pathogenic microbes; Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Aspergillus, and Microsporum. We also found no associations of mask-attached microbes with the transportation methods or gargling. We propose that immunocompromised people should avoid repeated use of masks to prevent microbial infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Bacteria , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Hygiene , Masks , Pandemics/prevention & control
4.
Research Square ; 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1786463

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led people to wear face masks daily in public. Although the effectiveness of the face masks against viral transmission has been extensively studied, there is no report on potential hygiene issues due to bacteria and fungi attached to the face masks. We aimed to demonstrate 1, information of the usage duration and types of masks;2, the number of bacteria and fungi attaching to masks;and 3, identification of the bacteria and fungi attaching to masks. We conducted a survey of 109 volunteers on their mask usage and lifestyles, and cultured bacteria and fungi on their masks. The colony numbers of bacteria were greater in the face-side than outer-side and those of fungal were fewer in the face-side than in the outer-side. A longer mask usage significantly increased the fungal colony counts, but not the bacterial colony counts. Although most identified microbes were non-pathogenic;S. epidermidis, S. aureus and Cladosporium, there were several pathogenic microbes;B. cereus, S. saprophyticus, Aspergillus, and Microsporum. We also investigated the associations between mask-attached microbes and individual lifestyles such as transportation and gargling. These findings suggest that people, especially compromised hosts, should avoid repeated use of masks to prevent microbial infection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL